The revolting use of social media

Claims have been made that the recent revolts in the Middle East owe their success to new social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. That’s a mighty role to assign to such social media, but it seems to ignore the fact that most citizens in the places affected do not have access to the Internet or mobile phones. What they all have are mouths and actual physical contact that have much more power to pass messages than electronic media.

It’s probably true that the world got to know about the events as they unfolded much faster than if they had to rely on television, radio, and newspapers. It’s also likely that more personal accounts and images of events spread beyond the immediate events and faster than might have been possible using more traditional media. Certainly, lots of unbridled and unfiltered opinion can come across through the new social media, including from people who are professional journalists. They add a different dimension to reporting of events, but to put them at the core of social movements is too strong.

We do have a tendency to think that speed of transmission of information about events is somehow essential to shaping how events develop. But, think about it. If you tweet, or update your Facebook page, or make a YouTube video of a sports event do you think that this will drive its outcome? Expressions of opinions about players and plays may have some effect on those who can follow in real-time, but would they drive a team to change its personnel or how it plays? If you believe such expressions can make for change, then go ahead and try it during the coming weekend’s Super Bowl game.

I will admit that it feels different to have heard so many personal accounts from those who are agitating, but they too are selective. We also get to read about, hear, or see events that some would prefer to hide from public view. In the fullness of time, we will not be surprised to get similar reports (maybe not in real-time) from those who are trying to control or confront agitators. But, not everyone has the same interests in getting information out to the public, so we will remain accustomed to those who are trying to control being blockers, rather than spreaders, of information. They understand that getting online is now part of getting out of line.




About The Grasshopper

Professional international economist, recently retired from an international organization. I use blogging as a way of organizing my ideas and thoughts about a range of topics. I was born in Jamaica, and spent many years being educated, living, and working in the UK. I lived in the USA for a few decades, and worked and travelled abroad extensively. My views have a wide international perspective. Father of girls. Also, married to an economist.
This entry was posted in Social Media and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The revolting use of social media

  1. Pingback: Jamaica: The Role of Social Media @ Current Affairs

  2. Pingback: Losing power | Grasshopper Eyes The Potomac

  3. BAFBFP says:

    The Governor of the Central Bank in Ba’bados last week said that there is no one in his profession (economist) who has the answer to this world crisis … that know one in his profession can advise as to how this thing could be solved ..! Well here is the thing, he still collects a salary at the end of each month, chances are, he is part of the problem … (Please Dennis, now is not the time to brag about being a professional economist..)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s